Santiago
Zabala
is an
Alexander
von Humboldt
Fellow at
Potsdam
University
Institute of
Philosophy.
He is the
author of
The Remains
of Being
(forthcoming),
and editor
of
Nihilism and
Emancipation,
Art's
Claim to
Truth,
The
Future of
Religion,
and
Weakening
Philosophy.
Contemporary
philosophers,
analytic as well
as continental,
tend to feel
uneasy about
Ernst Tugendhat,
who, though he
positions
himself in the
analytic field,
poses questions
in the
Heideggerian
style. According
to Tugendhat,
only formal
semantics can
answer the
questions left
open by
Heidegger. In
the words of
Rüdiger Bubner,
one of
Hans-Georg
Gadamer's most
distinguished
disciples, "Tugendhat,
instead of
following the
aesthetic line
followed by
Heidegger's
essay on The
Essence of the
Work of Art
and largely
taken over by
Gadamer's
hermeneutics,
chooses the
logical
direction,
seeking in
formal semantics
a differentiated
and precise
answer to the
ontological
question of
Being."
What Tugendhat
seeks to answer
is this: What is
the meaning of
thought
following the
linguistic turn?
Because of the
rift between
analytic and
continental
philosophers,
very few studies
have been
written on
Tugendhat, and
he has been
omitted
altogether from
several
histories of
philosophy. Now
that the
separation
between these
two schools has
begun to narrow,
Tugendhat has
become an
example of a
philosopher who
"built bridges
between
continents and
between
countries."
Tugendhat is
known more for
his
philosophical
turn than
for his
phenomenological
studies or for
his position
within analytic
philosophy, and
this creates
some confusion
regarding his
philosophical
setting. Is
Tugendhat
analytic or
continental? Is
he a follower of
Wittgenstein or
Heidegger? Does
he belong in the
culture of
analysis or in
that of
tradition? The
aim of this book
is to present
Tugendhat as an
example of
merged horizons,
and by doing so
prove that any
such labels
impoverish
philosophical
research.